Hebrew media attacks US-Iran agreement: “A shameful surrender and a strategic shock”

OCCUPIED QUDS, June 15 (YPA) – The framework agreement and the memorandum of understanding concluded between the United States and Iran have sparked a wide wave of controversy and criticism in the Zionist media.

A number of analysts and writers considered that the agreement came contrary to Tel Aviv’s expectations, with some describing it as a “strategic shock,” a “shameful surrender,” and even a “collapse of the slogan of complete victory.”

Following the announcement of the agreement, Zionist newspapers and channels published a series of analyses and commentaries addressing its political and security repercussions, amid assessments that the course of negotiations ended with results that do not align with the vision hoped for by the occupation government.

Commentaries in the Zionist media indicated that US President “Donald Trump” did not take Tel Aviv’s objections into account during the negotiation stages; rather, he exerted pressure on the Prime Minister of the occupation, “Benjamin Netanyahu,” to accept the agreement.

Some commentators went as far as to say that Tel Aviv’s influence in the regional equation has declined, and that it is no longer capable of playing a decisive role in shaping the course of events.

In interviews broadcast by Zionist channels, political analysts and former officials stated that the agreement granted Iran significant diplomatic gains, claiming that Washington agreed to a number of Tehran’s core demands, which could weaken the policy of pressure pursued by “Israel” toward Iran over the past years.

Analyses published by prominent Zionist newspapers also viewed that the diplomatic path pursued by Iran led to tangible results, noting that the clauses related to regional security arrangements and the ceasefire may limit the Zionist margin of maneuver in the region.

Some columnists described the agreement as a “shameful surrender,” accusing Netanyahu’s government of prioritizing domestic political calculations over national security considerations.

Furthermore, former security officials considered that the agreement might grant Iran more time rather than completely halting its nuclear program.

YPA