Amidst failed monitoring, tracking, “Israel” is pursuing hundred ghosts in southern Lebanon
The "legendary" defense systems under siege: how resistance drones shatter the myth of Israeli superiority
LEBANON, May 14 (YPA) – It seems that the Israeli occupation army, which has long boasted of its “legendary” defense systems, finds itself today chasing a thin thread of fiber optics extending over the hills of southern Lebanon, while the resistance’s drones turn into a daily nightmare haunting its soldiers, vehicles, and even the “Iron Dome” batteries themselves.
“Israeli” media no longer conceals the scale of the predicament. The Hebrew “Channel 12” spoke candidly about the occupation army’s readiness to expand its ground operations in Lebanon, not to achieve a “decisive victory,” but in an attempt to escape the strikes of explosive drones that have begun to impose their own equations on the battlefield.
The most embarrassing news for the military establishment of the occupation entity was the admission by the occupation army radio of the success of one of the resistance drones in targeting an “Iron Dome” battery—the very system that “Israel” marketed for years as an “impenetrable shield,” before it became a target itself in the crosshairs of these drones.
The Israeli occupation army, which possesses satellites, spy planes, and advanced surveillance technologies, appears bewildered by dozens of operators who maneuver these drones using simple fiber optic threads that rely neither on GPS nor on signals susceptible to jamming. Thus, the “primitive” technology of the resistance has transformed into a security and military conundrum that the occupation’s most sophisticated systems are unable to dismantle.
According to estimates within the occupation entity, the number of drone operators does not exceed about 100 individuals. The occupation army admits that these operators represent a “bottleneck” that disrupts its ability to impose field control.
The irony that makes the scene even harsher for the occupation is that some drone operators—according to Hebrew media—have occasionally managed to breach what is called the “Yellow Line” and operate within the security zone controlled by the Israeli occupation army, launching drones toward the heart of the occupied territories while radars remain unable to detect their traces.
At a time when “Tel Aviv” speaks of “intensive intelligence and technological efforts,” it appears that the resistance has succeeded in imposing a new equation: the more “Israeli” technology advances, the more the resistance innovates simpler and more effective means to turn that technology into a costly burden and a publicly broadcast failure.
While the occupation army searches for solutions to counter the drones, the Lebanese resistance continues to send its field messages clearly: the skies that “Israel” believed were under its complete control are no longer as safe as they once were.
YPA