YEMEN Press Agency

Iran’s earthquake strikes Tel Aviv, shatters myth of Israeli security

SANAA June 20 (YPA) – Amid the unprecedented escalation in the Palestinian arena and the conflict with the Israeli occupation, the recent Iranian strikes have represented a major strategic turning point in the equation of power and deterrence.

The accuracy and scope of these strikes exceeded all expectations and security analyses, reaching deep within the Israeli entity at its most sensitive and strategic points. These included the destruction of the command and information center in Beersheba, the mastermind behind Zionist military operations against the Palestinian resistance, and the precise and deadly strikes that struck the heart of Tel Aviv in, Ramat Gan and Holon.

According to military experts, these strikes were neither random nor symbolic, as the Israeli enemy had tried to portray them. but, they were the result of complex, long-term intelligence operations, culminating in the use of highly accurate missiles carrying advanced fragmentation warheads capable of bypassing all the Zionist defense systems that the entity has long boasted about. The strikes targeted Jabotinsky Street, the most vital economic and security artery in the entity, in Ramat Gan, where the World Diamond Exchange and strategic towers such as the Moshe Aviv Tower, the Twin Towers, the Ayalon Tower and other facilities that represent the backbone of the Israeli economy are located and provide the ideal cover for secret security centers.

There was compelling evidence the strikes specifically targeted secret meetings of high-ranking security and military leaders that were being held in these towers under the cover of economic activity.

The images and footage showing the depth of the entity revealed the massive destruction was being inflicted on these towers and the surrounding areas, including partial collapses in some of them. This indicates that the strikes hit vital points in the entity’s security and economic infrastructure, and the enemy was using these civilian facilities as a human shield to protect its secret security centers. This makes it solely responsible for the material and human losses resulting from these strikes.

The shocking scenes of devastation in Holon, south of Tel Aviv, also revealed that the targeted area was merely a front for an advanced intelligence base and a key coordination center for covert operations against the resistance in the region.

Experts confirmed that the exceptional accuracy which these fortified facilities, which were targeted hard, demonstrated the depth of Iranian intelligence penetration into the Zionist security infrastructure. Intelligence units within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were able to obtain highly accurate information about the locations of these sensitive centers, their meeting times, and their patterns of movement.

This major intelligence breach was a devastating blow to the myth of Zionist security superiority and reveals serious loopholes in the entity’s internal security system.

This was confirmed by the warning previously by Maj. Gen. Abdolrahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, which was not merely a political threat or psychological warfare, as some analysts have tried to portray it, but was a genuine operational warning that preceded the implementation of precise and destructive strikes.

The call that Mousavi directed at the residents of Tel Aviv and Haifa to leave their cities was a clear indication that the Iranian leadership possessed a comprehensive map of targets ready for implementation, and that the recent strikes had been only the beginning of a new phase of confrontation.

All of this action, including the nature of the weapons used, the timing of the strikes, and the selection of targets, all point to the existence of a well-thought-out strategic plan were aimed at redrawing the deterrence equation in the region.

Additionally, the Iranian strikes have succeeded in demonstrating several dangerous strategic facts for the Zionist entity. First, Israel’s interior is no longer safe or beyond the reach of the resistance forces. Second, Zionist defense systems, especially the Iron Dome, were no longer capable of protecting the entity from advanced missiles. Third, Zionist intelligence infrastructure suffers from serious gaps that have been breached in an unprecedented manner.

Amidst all of this, the strikes also carried extremely important political messages, the most important of which was that an attack on Iranian interests or targeting of the resistance in the region would be met with a harsh and unprecedented response, and that the Iranian leadership no longer adheres to the policy of strategic patience it followed in the past.

The current escalation opens a new chapter in the conflict with the Zionist entity, as the battle has shifted from a war of attrition on the borders to striking the enemy’s strategic depth. This qualitative shift in the tools of confrontation might have profound effects on the Israeli security strategy, which would be forced to radically review it.

In this context, the Israeli entity is continuing to hide the material and moral losses it has suffered in these strikes, which far exceed the announced figures. In addition to the direct damage to infrastructure and economic and security facilities, and there are another intangible losses represented by the tarnished image of the Israeli army as an invincible force and the cracking of Israel’s security doctrine, based on deterrence and technological superiority.

Meanwhile, the Zionist reactions to these strikes have revealed the extent of the shock and confusion within the corridors of the military and political leadership. Voices within the entity have begun to rise, warning of a new era of instability and the collapse of Israeli traditional security doctrine in the future.

Further escalation is expected, as Iran has had additional military and intelligence options that it can resort to should the Israeli aggression continue. The recent strikes have posed a true test of the effectiveness of Iran’s new military doctrine, based on precision, intelligence penetration, and strategic deterrence. The results made have exceeded all expectations and demonstrated that the security equations in the region have entered a new, more dangerous and complex phase for the Zionist entity.

Finally, the recent Iranian strikes were not merely a passing military operation, but rather a historic turning point in the conflict with Israel. The equation shifted from defensive to preemptive deterrence, from border warfare to strikes against strategic depth, and from political threats to precise operational execution.

These developments open a new page in the history of the conflict and present the entity with existential challenges that it can no longer ignore or overlook the serious consequences of.

AA