Sayyed Al-Houthi launches scathing attack on Saudi, Egyptian regimes

SANAA, Aug. 21 (YPA) – Sayyed Abdulmalik al-Houthi launched on Thursday a scathing attack on the Saudi and Egyptian regimes for their failure to support Gaza and their cooperation with the Israeli enemy with weapons and money.

In his weekly speech, Sayyed al-Houthi emphasized that the failure of the two-billion-Muslim nation to support Gaza was shameful, despite its capabilities and potential, in a bold speech, he revealed the truths were exposed by some Arab regimes that have gone beyond inaction by cooperating with the Israeli enemy, referring to Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

Al-Houthi said: “The Saudi ship that was exposed in an Italian port carrying weapons for the Israeli enemy, was it merely transporting weapons to the Israeli enemy?”

Sayyed Abdulmalik asked, “Is the Saudi regime, which possesses the largest oil reserves in the world, working as a porter for hire, carrying weapons to receive wages from the Israeli enemy?” explaining that what the Saudi regime was doing constituted support for the Israeli enemy.

“The Saudi regime is the richest regime in the entire Arab world, with its immense wealth,” he clarified, it does not work as a porter for hire. This support comes from a backer who provides military support and weapons to the Israeli enemy”.

Regarding the Egyptian regime’s cooperation, Sayyed Al-Houthi said, “The Egyptian deal that the Egyptian regime singed with the Zionists for thirty-five billion was a disaster and provided active support for the Israeli enemy under the pretext of obtaining gas.”

He went on to say that Egypt could obtain gas through investments within Egypt for this enormous sum, or it could obtain it from any Islamic country.

Al-Houthi criticized the negative attitude of Arab regimes, describing it as very unfortunate because of its impact on other Islamic countries and because they were hostile to those who stood with Palestine, just like Iran.

He described the adoption of the disarmament of Hamas was a Saudi position, a position of Arab regimes and the Palestinian Authority, emphasizing that the adoption and demand for the disarmament of the resistance in Lebanon would constitute support for “Israel” and was a political decision by Arab governments.

Leader Abdulmalik pointed out that ten years after the burning of Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Organization of the Islamic Conference issued a resolution to form a committee to develop a joint strategy for the liberation of Al Quds, but there was no practical action afterward!

“More than 45 years after the OIC resolution, there has been no movement, no vision, no strategy, and no practical steps, while the path of the OIC does not reflect seriousness and sincere action with Allah, the peoples of the nation, and their causes,” he stated.

He noted that the OIC’s response was clear evidence of a lack of seriousness and a lack of will, direction in taking a serious, practical stance against the threat targeting the entire Ummah.

Finally, “the criminal Netanyahu speaks of an existing practical project to establish “Greater Israel”, which means controlling the countries of the region and enslaving the nation,” he revealed, pointing out that the enemy was taking practical and serious action, while the Arab countries were issuing paper statements with rigid phrases without taking any practical action.

AA