Military Analysis: How Sanaa Forces Reversed the Balance of Power in the Face of “Israeli Ignorance”

SANAA, Aug. 25 (YPA) – Israeli entity’s repeated targeting of civilian sites in Sanaa reveals a state of helplessness, confusion, and intelligence failure in reaching the military and strategic objectives of Sanaa’s forces.

In this regard, Brigadier General Abdulsalam Sufyan, a military and strategic expert with the Sanaa forces, sees this behavior as proof that the Zionist entity was “surprised” from the very first moment it realized that Yemen would enter the confrontation.

Brigadier General Sufyan explained that this failure to identify military targets does not stem from a lack of intelligence but rather from a sophisticated defensive strategy adopted by Sanaa’s forces since the early moments of the “change in Yemen.” This strategy was based on building military capabilities in a way that makes it impossible for any enemy to reach them, taking advantage of Yemen’s “complex geography.”

As the pace of the confrontation between Sanaa’s forces and the Zionist entity has escalated, we pause here with a leading figure from Sanaa’s forces who is outlining a new phase of the conflict and revealing painful truths, particularly concerning the “Arab betrayals” that sided with the entity at a critical historical moment.

The Balance of Power in the Face of “Jihad”

While some believe that Sanaa’s entry into a confrontation with the Zionist entity in support of Gaza is an uncalculated adventure, especially given the clear disparity in military capabilities, Brigadier General Abdulsalam Sufyan, the military and strategic expert with Sanaa’s forces, categorically rejects this argument. He believes that “the battle between right and wrong does not require a balance of power at all,” and that victory is not dependent on numbers or material capabilities, but is “in the hands of God” and governed by “determination and steadfastness.”

Brigadier General Sufyan affirms that Sanaa’s forces have not only shown steadfastness but have also prepared what power they could, capabilities he describes as “great” and which have shown their effectiveness and impact in the Red Sea battle. He states that they have forced “great powers,” led by the U.S. and Britain, to retreat and withdraw.

The military expert goes even further, stating that these capabilities have allowed them to impose conditions on international powers, not the other way around, and that the Israeli entity has only hesitated to launch its aggression because of its inability to decisively win the battle with Yemen.

In Defense of Human Values

Yemeni military expert Brigadier General Abdulkareem Sufyan considers the heavy price Sanaa is paying to be part of the “jihad” chosen by the Yemenis in defense of their “nation’s cause” and their “humanity.” He points out that this position, which may seem like an adventure to some, is what “preserves all this meaning for the world” and refutes the idea that humanity’s “conscience” has died.

Brigadier General Sufyan stressed that the Yemenis realize this position requires “sacrifices” they are “certainly and willingly prepared for,” and that the popular turnout in marches confirms this readiness.

The military expert concluded his remarks by emphasizing that through this stance, the Yemenis are “establishing a case” for the entire nation and restoring Yemen’s “glory” and “values” at a time when others have chosen to abandon Gaza and the nation’s causes.

From Defense to Qualitative Offense

In this context, Brigadier General Sufyan reveals a sophisticated military strategy that is far from being a knee-jerk reaction. Instead, it is managed with “precise calculations and with a view to the future.” Military operations, most notably the launch of the cluster missile, confirm this approach.

This is a qualitative weapon, as described by the military and strategic expert with Sanaa’s forces, Brigadier General Abdulsalam Sufyan. He says it “will change many equations” and force 3-4 million Zionists to go into shelters, halting air and sea navigation. He explains that this tactic is not aimed at causing widespread destruction but rather at striking the entity’s “pillar of security,” which Sufyan considers to be the cornerstone of its existence.

In contrast, Brigadier General Sufyan portrays the Zionist entity’s bombing of civilian targets, such as oil stations and presidential headquarters, as a desperate act aimed at “media promotion” to cover up the “state of failure” it is experiencing. He illustrates this with the patience and resilience of the Yemeni people, who “do not care” about the explosions and continue their normal lives, in stark contrast to the state of “confusion” that plagues the entity.

The Essence of the Yemeni Position

The analysis of the Yemeni military expert goes deeper than the military battle. He describes the Yemeni position as stemming from the “spirit of history and the spirit of the land” and a “just cause” for which they are fighting. He considers this position, which has put Yemen in a global confrontation, to be a “divine choice” and a “divine duty” to defend the “sanctuaries of the nation” and “a part of our people.”

Sufyan also clarifies that the Yemeni position is not just military support, but is “establishing a case against the entire nation” and “against all of humanity.” He emphasizes that the massive popular presence in the millions-strong marches in the squares and streets of Sanaa and the Yemeni provinces under the authority of the Sanaa government is nothing but a “response to Allah,” a “jihad in His way,” and a show of support for the oppressed in Gaza and the resistance.

He contrasts the values of the Yemenis, who aspire to “dignity and honor” even if they have to eat dirt, with the entity that came “to usurp land.”

Rejecting Bargaining and Standing Firm on Principle

In the process of revealing the facts, Brigadier General Sufyan confirms that the steadfastness of the Yemeni position did not come from a vacuum but is the result of a categorical refusal to compromise on the Palestinian issue. He reveals that “generous” offers were made to the Yemeni leadership in exchange for abandoning the support for Gaza, which were met with rejection because they consider it an abandonment of “the religion we believe in” and “the faith we hold on to.” This is a position that Brigadier General Sufyan believes is what restores to Yemen its “glory, civilization, humanity, morals, and principles.”

Brigadier General Sufyan concludes his analysis by emphasizing that Yemen is moving towards “broader” options and with “greater steadfastness,” unconcerned by pressure or attempts to weaken the internal front.

He points out that “ignorance” of the truth of this people and their faith is what prevents their enemies from understanding them, and that the Zionist entity “is still unable to understand the Yemenis,” which makes Yemen’s firm position a “real dilemma for the Zionist entity” and behind it, America and the West.

YPA