SANAA, July 20 (YPA) – Activists on social media considered the United Nations envoy to Yemen, Martin Griffiths, a tool of war, not a peace envoy.
Activists mocked Griffiths’ inability to break the blockade of oil derivatives held by the Aggression Alliance for months.
Activists on the social networking site “Facebook” and “Twitter” launched the label #Griffith_Envoy_of_aggression, and accused him of participating in the murders of children and women in Yemen through the aerial bombardment of the alliance or starvation due to the siege.
They considered the UN envoy, “Martin Griffiths” part of the problem and an envoy to Britain and Saudi Arabia to pass their projects in Yemen.
The head of the national negotiating delegation, Mohamed Abdel Salam, said on his Twitter page, that the UN envoy, Martin Griffiths, separated from his mission of neutrality and fairness, and he became involved with the forces of aggression on Yemen, and fully adopted their thesis, which is what It makes him a participant in prolonging the war of aggression against the Yemeni people.
The ambassador of the Republic of Yemen to Iran, Ibrahim Al-Dailami, considered that the UN envoy recorded a major failure during his time in Yemen at all levels.